End Citizens United Fights to Reform Campaign Finance

Prior to the Citizens United ruling in 2010, campaign spending was regulated by the Federal Election Committee and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which kept corporations from contributing to electioneering communications (political advertising) and other parties from producing their own communications without approval from the candidate. Citizens United challenged the laws and won based on their argument that the law was prohibiting free speech. The Supreme Court agreed with their argument believed the previous laws were meant to prohibit funding, not free speech.

Based on the precepts of the First Amendment, “The government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether.” Citizens United won the Supreme Court ruling with only one vote. The dissenting voices noted that there would most probably be a diminished voice for the individual when it was up against the extensive investment of corporations.

End Citizens United has been fighting that very outcome. Today’s corporations are huge, worth billions of dollars and willing to spend large portions of their wealth to support candidates. The chosen candidates are those who are willing to push the agendas of their big money constituents, like the recent tax cut that mainly benefitted corporations and the wealthy.

End Citizens United supports candidates mainly of the Democratic Party, because the big money is given to Republican candidates. Many Democratic candidates have vowed to fight for campaign reform and a reversal of the Citizens United decision. End Citizens United does not depend on donations from corporations; instead it raises funds through grassroots fundraising efforts. Individuals give as little as $14 each, yet End Citizens United has been able to give millions in support of certain Democratic candidates.

Some incumbent candidates for Representative who have been endorsed by End Citizens United include Elijah Cummings of Maryland’s 7th district, Eric Swalwell of California’s 15th district and Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania’s 18th district. Among the many Senators End Citizens United supports are Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.

The majority of the public believes the Citizens United ruling was wrong. Now, its just a matter of the concerned organizations along with the voices of American citizens fighting to get this decision reversed. American politics is riddled with problems: financing irregularities, lengthy campaign terms and an inadequate system for the removal of inept, corrupt and/or otherwise unsuitable elected candidates. End Citizens United seeks to reform the political election process from finances to campaign terms.

To know more visit @: ballotpedia.org/End_Citizens_United_PAC

Grassroots Fundraising Remains Key For End Citizens United

In 2015, the traditional PAC End Citizens United was formed with an eye on reversing the controversial Citizens United decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. The arrival of the PAC came after the 2010 Citizens United decision which came about when the planned broadcast of a 90-minute television show, “Hillary: The Movie” was challenged by the Federal Election Commission. Attorneys for the FEC claimed the movie was a 90-minute campaign ad and was an unfair use of funds on the eve of the Democratic primaries by a group who consistently failed to reveal where their funding was coming from.

The 2010 Citizens United decision was a controversial one from the outset as court case initially arrived at a Federal Court which ruled on the side of the FEC. After moving to the Supreme Court, the decision came down in favor of Citizens United by a vote of 5-4 with the statement released on behalf of the four dissenters stating this was a clear attack on both free speech and the democratic process of the U.S.

Upon its establishment, End Citizens United made the decision to work under the restrictive measures of the traditional Political Action Committee limiting member donations to $5,000 per election cycle. In 2017, the PAC stated it was on target to meet its goal of raising more than $35 million in funds for the 2018 Midterms with an average donation at the time of $14; grassroots funding is an important strategic point for ECU President Tiffany Muller as it allows the PAC to steer clear of the political influence of special interest groups.

There are many reasons why the use of grassroots funding has become an important part of the work of End Citizens United including the creation of a national network of activists all working towards the goal of election finance reform. Other benefits of grassroots funding include the fact local activists can become linked through their work for End Citizens United and form a much larger local network which works together on a regular basis to back left-leaning candidates for political office.

For More info: docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00573261

Learn how to Sponsor a Great Campaign Rally Like NPG VAN Inc.

NPG VAN Inc. is a database that is utilized by the Democratic Party. This company also provides web hosting services for Democratic Party members. At one point this privately-owned company was employed to give campaign compliance software to many Democratic Party Congressmen. Mark Sullivan and Nathaniel Pearlman started this company back in 2001 in Washington D.C.


Another service that NPG VAN Inc. provides is campaign fundraising. They know how to perform this task online and in the real world. The company has many years of practical experience with helping candidates to raise voter support and financing. The following information will explain how anyone can sponsor a great campaign rally like NPG VAN Inc.


The first bit of advice that the company gives for sponsoring a great rally, is to figure out the best time to throw the event. Most rally events are usually thrown 2 weeks before voter turnout. However, political supporting organizations and candidates can sponsor support rallies when necessary or feasible to do so.


Supporters should figure out the best locations to sponsor the event, make sure they are receiving the right type of permits and be mindful of the details that the event will entail. NPG also wants supporters to know that they should be mindful of crowd size and to make sure they are converting supporters into voters.


Advertising for a rally can and should be done online. Candidates can reach out to their supporters and to potential voters through social media channels. They should also include traditional advertising methods such as television and radio commercials. Newspaper ads can also work for getting the message out as well.


One of the last things that NPG VAN Inc. wants campaign organizers to remember is that everything they are doing is to attract voters. They should make sure that their public event will actually get people out to the polls to vote for a particular candidate. A political rally that does not produce this type of result is a waste of time. NPG VAN Inc. advice for campaign rallies can help any candidate to be successful with voter sponsorship and turnout.


George Soros, the global Human Rights Philanthropist

In a move that elevated the position of Open Societies Foundation in the ranks of the charitable organization, George Soros transferred additional 18 billion US dollars to his foundation. Thanks to his benevolence, the human rights foundation is now the third largest charitable organization in the world, exceeded only by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and as well as Wellcome Trust. Speaking to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, Open Societies Foundation officials said that the Hungarian-born philanthropist had lately stepped up donations from his estimated cumulated earnings from hedge funds of 23 billion dollars.

Since its establishment in 1979, open societies has given away a cumulative 32 billion dollars in pursuant of its aim of building vibrant tolerant democracies all over the world. Launched by Mr. Soros in South Africa 38 years ago, Open Societies Foundation has given donations to over 100 countries globally. The foundations are committed to the global struggle for open societies where governments allow transparency and the participation of its people.

Mr. Soros, who was a significant supporter for Hillary Clinton’s presidential race, made this latest transfer of funds at a time when he is engaged in a row with the government of Hungary over media academic freedom.

The donation, which surpassed nearly all other contributions made in recent times by a private investor to a single foundation, was made silently in small installments but only disclosed days ago. The move by Mr. Soros, a perennial lightning rod for right-wing critics, placed him at the fore of socio-political debates expected to develop across the global platform.

The foundation, founded and chaired by the billionaire hedge fund manager, has increased its attention on the US in recent years where it has channeled funds to not only reduce police brutality but also to safeguard the right of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans-sexual (LGBT). The foundation not only featured during times of national need like during the 2014 outbreak of Ebola when it financed treatment centers but also during the aftermath of 2016 elections where there were widespread waves of crimes of hate.

Having lived in Hungary as a boy at a time when the Nazi-occupied it, Mr. Soros developed his liberal perspective as a result of his childhood experiences. Having lived in a society deprived of individual rights, virtually a ‘closed’ community, Mr. Soros developed a passion for promoting democracy openness, a good cause he began to fund as soon as his fortunes started to grow on Wall Street as a trader.

Darren Walker, the president of Ford Foundation, praised the Open Societies Foundation saying that no other foundation, not even the Ford Foundation, had impacted the world like Mr. Soro’s foundation in the past 20 years. He explains that owing to the global influence of the foundation, their legacy is wider and their effect is felt more.

The president of the organization reports that Mr. Soros is constantly involved in the work of the organization and he is always in communication with the president and more information click here.